On Milo Yiannopoulos and Free Speech and Power

By

I've seen a few people taking devil's advocate positions with regards to the UC Berkeley protests of Milo Yiannopoulos and the idea that shutting down a speaking engagement is infringing on or stifling free speech. I heard this same argument when activists were shutting down Donald Trump campaign events last year as well. So I wanted to respond to those concerns with a quick and dirty analysis of the power dynamics inherent in the concept of free speech.

So here's the thing: even if you think everyone should have free speech regardless of the ideas they espouse (including those that incite hatred and violence, which I would argue should not be tolerated, but in any case), someone being given a massive public platform to spread their ideas has a distinctly inordinate amount of "free speech" compared to others who don't have that platform. Taking away that platform through direct action isn't infringing on their free speech, it's just taking away that platform. They're still free to say whatever they want, they just don't have that particular audience at that particular time anymore.

And, by the way, realistically, the person in question probably still has an audience in the sense of having a fanbase (Milo himself has a book deal with one of the most prominent book publishers for crying out loud--his free speech is anything but infringed upon). Shutting down a speaking engagement like this is the most effective way that the collective power of people without such a platform can express their free speech in a way that reaches anywhere near as many people as people like Milo are able to reach on a daily basis.

If we're going to have a legitimate discussion about free speech then we need to include an analysis of the power dynamics of speech. One of the most common arguments against the idea that "money = speech" (which, in large part, forms the foundation of the Citizens United decision) is that if some people have VASTLY more "speech" (money) than others, then how can speech be free? Economic and institutional power carries with it a wealth of "speech"--i.e. a wealth of opportunity and ability to make your voice heard by an inordinate number of people. Denying those people a fraction of that wealth of "speech" is not "stifling free speech." It's attempting to level the playing field by the only means available--and it still doesn't come CLOSE to leveling the playing field. The protesters in Berkeley weren't "stifling" Milo's free speech. They were exercising theirs.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 4

By
-Can we officially shut the fuck up about Jake Locker now? I don't care if he was playing the Pittsburgh Steelers, 4-20 for 71 yards, a TD, and 2 INTs is unacceptable. If you take away a 45 yard TD strike to Jermaine Kearse, he was 3-19 for 26 yards and 2 INTs. He's got lots of talent and I'm sure he's a perfectly decent kid but the idea that Locker is the ultimate prospect in this year's NFL Draft is inexplicable. His Heisman campaign is obviously deader than dead at this point and I see no reason that he won't be the next Tim Couch. -Here's a random one: Kansas is down 31-10 to Southern Miss...they score a touchdown with 5:17 left in the game...and go for two?! Uh...what? Who did the math on that one? What possible scenario are they planning for? Are they planning cut the deficit to 13 instead of 14 in hopes that, in the event that they have to settle for two field goals at some point, they can still tie the game (with the addition of another touch
Read more

COMICBOOK REVIEW: Garfield's Pet Force 2014 Special

By
Image
Time for a comicbook review of an unusual comic for me. Every once in a while at the comic shop, I may feel particularly random. Something odd may call to me from the shelves. This comic is one such oddity. Garfield's Pet Force 2014 Special jam-packed with two epic Garfield's Pet Force stories. What is Garfield's Pet Force? I had no idea. I'm familiar with the concept of Oddie and Garfield and watched the cartoon a few times as a kid. I wouldn't consider myself a Garfield fan in the slightest. This comic may have changed my mind on the lasagna loving cat, though. Garfield's Petforce is Garfield as a superhero named Garzooka. Garzooka leads the Pet Force which is made up of his cartoon friends who have their own superpowers and dorky names. The stories are written by Scott Nickel. The first one is called "Cat-astrophe in the Cosmos" with pencils by Gary Barker and George Lane the third, inks were done by Mark and Stephanie Heike. The story s
Read more

Count Down to the New Year By Syncing These Epic Movie Moments at Midnight

By
Image
Because this is 2020, we know most of us will likely be spending our New Year's Eve at home--but that doesn't mean we can't do something special to celebrate the death of this foul year of our Lord. So here's a list of our favorite movies that sync up to ring in the new year with a big, epic moment and what time you should start watching them on New Year's Eve.  For the best results, we suggest starting the movie, pausing it, setting it to 0:00:00 and unpausing at the time suggested. We also suggest watching these movies on DVD or BluRay if possible because even the most insignificant streaming blips can throw off the timing completely. Cabin in the Woods - 10:30:07 PM If you want to ring in the new year with the Old Gods rising again, hit play on Drew Goddard's modern classic Cabin in the Woods at 10:30:07 PM (10:30 and 7 seconds) and at the stroke of midnight, the giant hand will come crashing down. Fight Club - 9:44:19 PM Perhaps you prefer a more anarchist a
Read more